Preaches Another Jesus – Clarification

Yesterday, I wrote an article called “He That Preaches Another Jesus“, and I spoke of a “Christian Jesus”. In retrospect, I think I should not have phrased it that way. I think I should have said “the Jesus I learned about growing up”.

I recognized before I hit the publish button that this article would cause a stir, simply because of it’s controversial content but I didn’t want to add to the controversy by using words in such a way that it was disparaging to a particular group of people. For that, I am sorry. (I have since edited it to reflect the change in terminology.)

Most of the controversy that I see is over the holidays/days commonly identified with Christianity: Christmas, Easter and Sunday/Sabbath.

Sunday / Sabbath

I believe the idea of Sunday being the Sabbath day is not as common as Christmas & Easter being Christian holidays, but there are some who believe this. In my personal church-going experience, I have not had direct teaching on Sunday and how it relates to the Sabbath day, but I have been told in the past we worship on Sunday because that is the day Jesus rose from the dead.

Personally, I don’t believe that Jesus rising from the dead on Sunday is Biblically true, but that is my personal understanding of Scripture. The Scripture does not clearly say He was raised on Sunday (the first day of the week). However, it does say he was not there when Mary came to the tomb on Sunday morning the first day of the week. It’s debatable as to when he actually came out of the tomb. I consider that to be a doubtful disputation.

Christmas and Easter

I had and have no intention of passing judgment on anyone who celebrates these holidays. Personally, I have chosen not to. The point I was trying to make in the article was the “holiday” of Christmas and the “holiday” of Easter are not in the Bible. They were not celebrated by Jesus when he walked the earth (for obvious reasons, I think), but then they weren’t celebrated by the early church in Acts either. Does that make them bad or wrong? No, at least not simply because those holidays are not mentioned in the Bible. I have other personal thoughts on that, but I’ll share them at another time.

I went into great length describing my logic in the timing of the death, burial & resurrection. I understand that this is debatable as well. If someone else has another theory and they would like to share it, I’m open to hear it. But I need Scripture to back up the theory if I’m going to consider changing my personal conclusion. Now, am I willing to “split fellowship” over which day of the week these things took place? Absolutely not. As I stated, I believe there’s room for debate on this, and I don’t think it alters our position in eternity.

I do take issue with imparting ideas through these holidays as if they were “gospel truth”. For example, the idea that “Jesus was born on Christmas morning” is not true. The idea that “Christmas is Jesus’ birthday” is not true. While it is a day that Christians choose to celebrate the birth of Christ, it is not his birthday. Semantics, perhaps. You can just call it a personal pet peeve if you like. Am I passing judgment on anyone when I correct the record by stating he was not born on Christmas? I don’t think so. I certainly don’t mean to convey that.

Sabbaths and the LORD’s Feasts

I feel those who preach and teach in Christian circles have done a disservice to the gospel by leaving out these essential factors. Jesus said the Sabbath was made for man (His words); it was a gift from God to all of mankind (my words), and it is my personal opinion that anyone who professes to teach the Word of God yet withholds or disguises the truth regarding this gift is robbing the people of their blessing.

Again, this is my personal opinion: When preachers & teachers omit teaching the correlation between the LORD’s appointed feasts and our Messiah, Jesus to the Christian community, they are leaving a huge chasm in understanding God’s plan for mankind. As a result, it is my opinion that many people within Christianity are clueless about the Great Tribulation, the second coming of Jesus and his millenial reign.

The Dietary Laws: Clean vs. Unclean Food

It is my personal opinion that those who refuse to preach/teach YHWH’s position on food consumption is contributing to the massive health crisis within Christianity. People are being taught that it doesn’t matter what kind of meat we eat, despite the fact that God made a distinction in His Word between what is considered food and what is not.

Am I suggesting that those who teach these things are going to Hell? Absolutely not. Am I suggesting that those who teach these things are robbing their listeners of a blessing. Yes, I am.

Getting Back to Yesterday’s Article

The point I was trying to make was that the “Jesus I learned about growing up” was different than the one I see now in Scripture. The picture of a Jesus who puts away the Sabbath day, forsakes the Feasts of the LORD and approves of consuming meat from animals that God specificly said were abominable/detestable is not the Jesus I believe Paul preached. Some may disagree and they are welcome to do so. However, I encourage everyone: Go back to your Bibles and search the Scriptures to learn more about the Jesus whom Paul preached.

NOTE: Please understand this post describes my understanding of the Scripture at the time of this writing. If you see there is something I am missing in my understanding, please feel free to share it with me in love. I will be glad to hear other perspectives as I seek to remain teachable.

4 thoughts on “Preaches Another Jesus – Clarification

  1. Pingback: He That Preaches Another Jesus

  2. Carrie Wigal Post author

    When we go back to the beginning of that passage, we see the context of that verse starts with the Pharisees asking Jesus why his disciples were disobeying the Jewish tradition (not the Law of God), concerning washing their hands before eating. Jesus replied asking why they violated the Law of God for the sake of their tradition, then he called them hypocrites and quoted Isaiah.

    This tells me (1) the issue at hand is a tradition of man, not the law of God, and (2) Jesus rebukes them for breaking the law of God with their tradition, stating their hearts were far from God.

    When Jesus gathers the crowd around him and tells them it’s not what goes in their mouth that defiles them, but what comes out of it. This tells me that he’s teaching something contrary to what they’ve already been taught. Remember, the initial issue dealt with “washing their hands before eating” (not “eating meat from unclean animals”) — the teaching concerning this tradition must have been “doing so, would prevent defilement.”

    If we think about it logically, why would he rebuke the Pharisees for breaking the law of God and then turn around and teach against the law of God himself? Surely, he can’t be saying “it’s okay now to eat unclean animals”.

    That’s my take on it.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *